By Laurence I. Blair, Esq.
Board Certified Real Estate Attorney
January 2013
While the entire country held its collective breath, the U.S. Congress narrowly averted the much publicized “fiscal cliff,” by passing the “American Taxpayer Relief Act of 2012” (the “Act”), which President Obama signed into law less than twenty-four hours later. The Act made certain changes to the Estate, Gift and Generation Skipping Transfer (“GST”) tax laws, the most important of which are:
The Act maintains the $5,000,000 exemption amounts (indexed for inflation yearly) for the Estate, Gift and GST tax. Taking into account the indexing for inflation, the exemption amount for gifts and Generation-Skipping transfers made in 2013 and for the estates of decedents dying in 2013 is $5,250,000.
The Act increases the Estate, Gift and GST tax rate from the 2012 rate of 35% to a maximum rate of 40% on gifts made, or assets passing at death, in excess of the exemption amounts, after December 31, 2012.
Also in 2013, an individual’s gift tax annual exclusion, the amount which an individual can gift to any other person without it counting against their $5,250,000 Gift tax exemption for 2013, increases from $13,000 to $14,000 per donee.
The Act also makes the concept of portability for the estate and gift tax exemptions permanent. This concept was first introduced in 2010 and allows a surviving spouse to utilize their most recent deceased spouse’s unused estate and gift tax exemption, in addition to their own estate and gift tax exemptions. However, unlike the estate and gift tax exemptions, the GST tax exemption is not portable, so it is important to make efficient use of it during your lifetime.
Despite the fact that the Act does not contain an automatic expiration date, which was the case with the previous legislation, Congress has made clear that it intends to address comprehensive tax reform during 2013, which could result in further changes to the Estate, Gift and GST tax laws. Due to time pressures caused by the impending “fiscal cliff,” the Act failed to address certain estate planning techniques, which have been the subject of recent discussions aimed at increasing tax revenue from the Estate, Gift and GST taxes. Any further tax reform by Congress may adversely affect these estate planning techniques, which are widely used to transfer wealth and minimize tax consequences, including: intentionally defective grantor trusts (“IDGTs”), grantor retained annuity trusts (“GRATs”) and entity based valuation discounts. However, due to Congress’ haste to hammer out a deal, these highly beneficial estate planning tools are currently still available, and the advantages of these techniques are discussed in detail below:
INTENTIONALLY DEFECTIVE GRANTOR TRUSTS (IDGTs)
An intentionally defective grantor trust (IDGT) is an irrevocable trust that has the following characteristics: (1) transfers of property to the trust are considered completed gifts for federal gift and estate tax purposes, (2) property in the trust will not be includable in the gross estate of the grantor (the creator of the trust) for federal gift and estate tax purposes, and (3) income from the trust will be taxed to the grantor. An IDGT is a useful estate planning tool if you want to reduce your gross estate, and you want the trust income to be taxed to you during your lifetime, rather than to the trust beneficiaries or the trust entity.
The main benefit of an IDGT is that income from the trust is taxed to you as the grantor of the trust, rather than to the trust itself or its beneficiaries. This can be advantageous for multiple reasons. Paying the taxes on the trust income can reduce the size of your gross estate, and, because neither the trust nor the beneficiaries of the trust will be liable for the taxes, the trust income essentially compounds tax free. In effect, by paying the taxes on the trust income, the grantor is making an additional tax-free gift to the trust and the trust assets will therefore grow more rapidly. The use of an IDGT also allows certain transactions between the grantor and the trust, such as the purchase and sale of assets, to be disregarded for income tax purposes.
GRANTOR RETAINED ANNUITY TRUSTS (GRATs)
A grantor retained annuity trust (GRAT) is an irrevocable trust into which a grantor makes a one-time transfer of one or more high-yield assets and retains the right to receive a fixed amount of principal and interest at least annually for a term of years. At the end of the term of years or upon the death of the grantor, whichever is earlier, any remaining property in the GRAT passes to the remainder beneficiaries (typically the grantor’s children) or is held in trust for their benefit. The present value of the grantor’s retained interest is subtracted from the total value of the transferred property when determining the amount of the gift to the remainder beneficiaries for gift tax purposes. The gift is “discounted” using a calculation based on the IRS’ assumed rate of return in effect during the month the gift is made (this is known as the Section 7520 rate, hurdle rate, or discount rate). A GRAT can also be structured so that the retained interest is equal to the value of the transferred property, in which case there are no gift tax consequences (this is referred to as a “zeroed-out GRAT”).
Assets transferred to a GRAT, and appreciation in the assets after being transferred to the GRAT, will not be included in the grantor’s gross estate as long as he or she outlives the term of the retained interest. Therefore, a GRAT is only advantageous if the grantor outlives the term of the retained interest. Because of this “Rolling GRATs” have become a popular estate planning tool designed to capture and remove the appreciation of rapidly growing assets from the grantor’s gross estate. Rolling GRATs accomplish this by using a series of short term GRATs and capturing the appreciation at the end of each term. This estate planning tool is most advantageous during times, such as now, when the Section 7520 rate is at historic lows. However, there have been recent proposals in Congress, seeking to eliminate GRATs which have terms of less than 10 years. If this change is implemented GRATs would become a far less effective estate planning tool.
VALUATION DISCOUNTS
There is a significant difference between what a business is worth as a whole and what a percentage of the business is worth. If you own 100 percent of a business with a fair market value (FMV) of $1 million, you may be able to sell your interest for that amount. If you own a minority interest (less than 50 percent) in a business with the same total value, you will not be able to get a comparable percentage of the total value if you attempt to sell it. A potential buyer would demand a minority interest discount to compensate for the lack of marketability and the inability to control the operation or disposition of the business inherent in a minority position. Minority interest discounts may reduce the valuation of a minority interest by as much as 20 percent to 40 percent.
Unlike estate taxes, which are based on the total value of the property held at death, gift tax is based on the fair market value (FMV) of the property transferred; the amount a stranger would pay for it. Therefore, it is often advantageous to establish an entity, usually a family limited partnership or limited liability company, to hold and manage assets for business purposes, and then later on, portions of the entity can be gifted to children, or other descendants, at discounted values. The gift tax is computed on the discounted value of the interest, resulting in a lower total gift tax liability than if the gift were of a total majority interest, or an outright interest in the underlying assets.
MISCELLANEOUS
As you are probably aware by now, the Act also maintained the individual income tax rates for everyone except individuals earning over $400,000 and married couples filing jointly earning over $450,000. For taxpayers falling into either of those categories, the new income tax rate for 2013 increased from the 2012 rate of 35% to 39.6%. These taxpayers will also be subject to an increased tax rate on capital gains and dividends of 20%, up from the 2012 rate of 15%. In addition, for 2013 the Affordable Health Care and Patient Protection Act will impose a 3.8% Medicare tax on the lesser of an individual’s net investment income, or the amount the individual’s adjusted gross income exceeds $200,000 or $250,000 for married couples filing jointly. Net investment income includes income from interest, capital gains, dividends, annuities, royalties and rents, after taking any deductions related to that income. Based on these increased rates for 2013 it might be a good time for you to consider transferring assets, or even portions of assets, which generate significant income or capital gains to your descendants to take advantage of the lower income tax and capital gains tax rates at which they are taxed, if they are in a lower income tax bracket.
The Act also extended certain individuals’ ability to make a direct transfer of up to $100,000 from an IRA to charity for 2013. If you are required to take distributions from any IRA’s in 2013, you can satisfy your “required minimum distribution” and your charitable intent all at once by having the custodian of your IRA distribute up to $100,000 from your IRA directly to a qualified charity of your choice.
Please contact our office at your first convenience to schedule an appointment, so that we can discuss your existing plan and how you might be able to take advantage of these estate planning tools before further changes to the Estate, Gift and GST tax laws make them unavailable.
Laurence I. Blair, Esq. is a shareholder at Greenspoon Marder, where he focuses his practice in the areas of Tax, Trusts & Estates; Corporate & Business; and Guardianship. Mr. Blair is Board Certified by the Florida Bar in the areas of Wills, Trusts & Estates. He can be reached at.
[email protected] . or 561-994-2212