By: Hector A. Chichoni, Esq.
The Department of Homeland Security (“DHS”) announced a few days ago a final rule in connection with the H-1B program, which, supposedly, and according to DHS “…will significantly enhance U.S. companies’ ability to fill job vacancies in critical fields, strengthening our economy.” Moreover, DHS, with only a few changes made to the final rule, but stating that it favors employers, claimed in its announcement that “…the new rule modernizes the H-1B program by streamlining the approvals process, increasing its flexibility to better allow employers to retain talented workers, and improving the integrity and oversight of the program.”
Moreover, the final rule builds on previous efforts made by Administrations “…to ensure the labor needs of American businesses are met while reducing undue burdens on employers and adhering to all U.S. worker protections under the law.”
Even further, Secretary of Homeland Security Alejandro N. Mayorkas stated that “American businesses rely on the H-1B visa program for the recruitment of highly-skilled talent, benefitting communities across the country,” and that “…these improvements to the program provide employers with greater flexibility to hire global talent, boost our economic competitiveness, and allow highly skilled workers to continue to advance American innovation.”
So, naturally, U.S. employers who use the H-1B program must be wondering what is in this final rule. What are the changes? Do these changes really benefit employers? Are these changes for the better? And, more importantly, if these changes are any good, how long will they last?
U.S. employers should be prepared because this is only one of many immigration-related adjustments employers will have to make in the next few months and even years. Employers have also heard that the upcoming Trump administration has caused legal experts to warn about likely deep changes in U.S. immigration law which will range from worksite investigations, FDNS visits, wage and hour audits, as well as I-9 and E-Verify audits and other compliance obligations.
An important hint, perhaps, is provided by USCIS Director Ur M. Jaddou when he said in reference to the H-1B final rule changes , “The H-1B program was created by Congress in 1990, and there’s no question it needed to be modernized to support our nation’s growing economy…the changes made in today’s final rule will ensure that U.S. employers can hire the highly skilled workers they need to grow and innovate while enhancing the integrity of the program .”
For starters, DHS’s new “final” H-1B rule will take effect on Jan. 17, 2025. However, this is only the “last portion” of the originally proposed H-1B rules in October 2023. Previous portions of the originally proposed rule, which includes the one announced in January 2024, took effect in March 2024. The final H-1B rule builds on prior portions of the originally proposed final rule, but for all practical purposes and with a few exceptions, it is almost the same as the entire originally proposed final DHS rule. The final rule requires a new edition of Form I-129, Petition for a Nonimmigrant Worker for all petitions beginning Jan. 17, 2025.
So, here are a few of the key provisions in the final H-1B rules issued by DHS:
DHS has Revised the H-1B Specialty Occupation Definition and Criteria
The rule makes clear that an occupation “normally” requiring a bachelor’s degree does not necessarily mean that it must “always” require a bachelor’s degree. It clarifies that a position may qualify as a specialty occupation even if the employer accepts a range of qualifying degree fields, but states that the degree or its equivalent must be “directly related” to the duties of the position. “Directly related” is defined as having a logical connection between the degree and the job duties. The final rule will now allow a range of qualifying degree fields for as long as each field is directly related to the position’s duties. Further, experts have noted that DHS removed references to specific degree titles such as “business administration” and “liberal arts” to avoid the very common problem of relying on degree titles rather than emphasizing the relevance of the degree’s content.
Deference to Prior Adjudications
The final rule clarifies and amplifies the current rule used by USCIS to give deference to its prior adjudications. The current rule regulation provides that when adjudicating a Form I-129 involving the same parties and same underlying facts, USCIS should defer to its prior I-129 approval, unless there has been a material change in circumstances or eligibility requirements, a material error in the prior approval, or new material adverse information. One important point is that the deference policy was previously canceled by the first Trump Administration. The cancellation, as employers and HR professionals may recall, resulted in the issuance of many requests for evidence (RFEs) and denials. There is no assurance, however, that the codification of the final rule in connection with this policy will prevent cancellation in the future.
H-1B Location Changes and Amending Petitions
The final rule makes part of the code USCIS’ requirement that an employer must amend a nonimmigrant petition due to material changes in a foreign national employee’s place of employment and requires that the amendment be filed before the change takes place. The final rule also makes part of the code scenarios in which a location change would not require an amendment.
Business Owners’ H-1B Eligibility
An important codification is that H-1B beneficiaries who have a controlling interest in the petitioning entity may be eligible for H-1B status, as long as the beneficiary will perform H-1B duties which are at specialty occupation levels a majority of the time. The initial H-1B and first extension of such petitions will be limited to 18 months instead of the usual three years.
Good Faith Offer of H-1B Employment
The final rule codifies USCIS’ practice of requesting contracts and additional evidence to show a good faith job offer but clarifies that a petitioner is not required to establish specific “day-to-day” duties for the validity requested in the H-1B petition.
Employer Requirement to Have Legal Presence in the U.S.
The final rule codifies a requirement that the H-1B petitioner must have a legal presence in the United States and be available to receive service of process in the U.S.
Longer Cap-Gap Protections
The final rule provides a longer cap-gap protection period, which extends from October 1 to, possibly, as late as April 1 of the next calendar year for individuals in F-1 status who are beneficiaries of a “timely filed” H-1B petition. Further, the final rule provides up to six months of additional employment authorization to help students in F-1 status avoid any interruptions while waiting for their change of status to H-1B.
Reduction on the Impact of Lengthy Adjudications
H-1B employers may be allowed by USCIS the opportunity to amend a petition’s requested nonimmigrant employment validity period if the requested validity period has already passed by the time the petition is adjudicated.
Codification of FDNS Site Visits
The final rule codifies USCIS’s Fraud Detection and National Security (FDNS) unit’s site visits. The rule also states that refusal to comply with a site visit could result in the denial or revocation of an H-1B petition.
Expansion and Changes to H-1B Cap Exemptions
The final rule allows for cap exemption even if research or education is not the organization’s primary activity or mission, as long as research or education is one of the organization’s fundamental activities.
The final rule will take effect three days before President-Elect Donald Trump assumes power on Jan. 20, 2025. Employers, as well as HR personnel, should not assume the new administration will not seek to make changes to or from seeking to eliminate the regulation. On the contrary, there is a likelihood that deeper and more restrictive changes may be forthcoming.